PDA

View Full Version : What you should know about the Sprint/Nextel merger (CNET article)


Tinman
September 9th 05, 07:47 PM
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3504_7-6310178-1.html?tag=nl.e501

Bob Smith
September 9th 05, 08:29 PM
"Tinman" > wrote in message
...
> http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3504_7-6310178-1.html?tag=nl.e501
>
I read that review earlier this morning, and it's basically correct, save
that the author was incorrect about fees and switching from one carrier to
the other.

It's going to be awhile, till the customers can see the benefits of what
each carrier can bring to the table as a combined effort.

Bob

jayskinner@gmail.com
September 10th 05, 12:41 AM
He was also incorrect about mobile-to-mobile minutes. I have the Sprint
$5/month PCS to PCS unlimited minutes, and my calls to my brother's
Nextel work phone hit against those minutes now, whereas before they
came ourt of my anytime or N&W bucket.

jayskinner@gmail.com
September 10th 05, 12:43 AM
He was also incorrect about mobile-to-mobile minutes. I have the Sprint

$5/month PCS to PCS unlimited minutes, and my calls to my brother's
Nextel work phone hit against those minutes now, whereas before they
came out of my anytime or N&W bucket.

Tinman
September 10th 05, 08:15 AM
Paul Miner wrote:
> On 9 Sep 2005 16:41:46 -0700, wrote:
>
>> He was also incorrect about mobile-to-mobile minutes. I have the
>> Sprint $5/month PCS to PCS unlimited minutes, and my calls to my
>> brother's Nextel work phone hit against those minutes now, whereas
>> before they came ourt of my anytime or N&W bucket.
>
> As long as we're pointing out oddities in the article, I believe he
> was wrong about the stock symbol, (it's S instead of FON now),

I should have mentioned, like many CNET articles (or any article with
reader feedback) the real truth is usually found in the reader
responses. Nearly every flaw in the article was addressed in the reader
comments.

It's getting to the point that I now take most of these articles by
"experts" with a grain of salt till I've read the reader feedback. I'm
guessing the Websites don't mind--and don't bother much with
corrections--as they end up with more page-views per article.


--
Mike

Google